Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (12A.)
Directed by J.A. Bayona.
Starring Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Ted Levine, Rafe Spall, Toby Jones, Daniella Pinada, Justice Smith, B. D. Wong, James Cromwell, Isabella Sermon, Geraldine Chaplin and Jeff Goldblum. 128 mins.
The defining feature of the dinosaurs' time on the planet, as I understand it, was a stubborn refusal to kick-start the whole evolution fad. They ruled the earth for the best part of 200 million years but their extinction seems to have found them little the wiser than when they first appeared. When it comes to the cinema, this resistance to evolution appears to be infectious. There something about dinosaurs that makes people quite militant in asserting their right to turn-your-brain-off fun. Here we are at Jurassic Park 5 and nothing much seems to have moved on since Spielberg first started it back in 1993. Within a few minutes of the film starting, what do they decide to do? Go back to the damn island.
Fallen Kingdom is a definite improvement on Jurassic World, but maybe I'm not the best person to listen to on the Jurassics. My favourite one is Lost World, the Spielberg-directed sequel, which everybody seems to vigorously hate. (Still can't see why: it replaced Neill and Dern with Goldblum and Julianne Moore; the motorhome dangling from the cliff top sequence is the most exciting in any of the films and it has the King Kong style ending.) This one is closest to that in as much as the film doesn't spend all the time at the island but takes the action back to the mainland. It also incorporates some of the ideas John Sayles came up with for Jurassic Park 3 which were considered too wild to use.
Pratt is much more comfortable in the lead role this time, and Howard's character has been given a bit more dignity. There are a plethora of quality villains including Toby Jones who makes good use of a combover. Spanish director Bayona (The Orphanage, The Impossible, A Monster Calls) brings more imagination to the staging of the set pieces than anyone since Spielberg himself and the script has just a bit of depth to it.
But, it is still utterly disposable, to a degree that is significant even in comparison with other summer blockbusters. Star Wars and the various schools of superhero movies provoke passionate feelings among fans and audience. People really love these movies but I imagine the most enthusiastic response you'll get to this film is someone emerging from the darkness announcing, "Hey that was really great. Where shall we eat?"
Probably my biggest gripe with this and the previous entry is they break the promise of their titles. It's supposed to be Jurassic World, not Park. (Spoiler, this one goes a little way towards rectifying that but only in its last few minutes.) These films have a license to break free and run wild, yet they choose to remain tame and submissive.
Directed by J.A. Bayona.
Starring Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Ted Levine, Rafe Spall, Toby Jones, Daniella Pinada, Justice Smith, B. D. Wong, James Cromwell, Isabella Sermon, Geraldine Chaplin and Jeff Goldblum. 128 mins.
The defining feature of the dinosaurs' time on the planet, as I understand it, was a stubborn refusal to kick-start the whole evolution fad. They ruled the earth for the best part of 200 million years but their extinction seems to have found them little the wiser than when they first appeared. When it comes to the cinema, this resistance to evolution appears to be infectious. There something about dinosaurs that makes people quite militant in asserting their right to turn-your-brain-off fun. Here we are at Jurassic Park 5 and nothing much seems to have moved on since Spielberg first started it back in 1993. Within a few minutes of the film starting, what do they decide to do? Go back to the damn island.
Fallen Kingdom is a definite improvement on Jurassic World, but maybe I'm not the best person to listen to on the Jurassics. My favourite one is Lost World, the Spielberg-directed sequel, which everybody seems to vigorously hate. (Still can't see why: it replaced Neill and Dern with Goldblum and Julianne Moore; the motorhome dangling from the cliff top sequence is the most exciting in any of the films and it has the King Kong style ending.) This one is closest to that in as much as the film doesn't spend all the time at the island but takes the action back to the mainland. It also incorporates some of the ideas John Sayles came up with for Jurassic Park 3 which were considered too wild to use.
Pratt is much more comfortable in the lead role this time, and Howard's character has been given a bit more dignity. There are a plethora of quality villains including Toby Jones who makes good use of a combover. Spanish director Bayona (The Orphanage, The Impossible, A Monster Calls) brings more imagination to the staging of the set pieces than anyone since Spielberg himself and the script has just a bit of depth to it.
But, it is still utterly disposable, to a degree that is significant even in comparison with other summer blockbusters. Star Wars and the various schools of superhero movies provoke passionate feelings among fans and audience. People really love these movies but I imagine the most enthusiastic response you'll get to this film is someone emerging from the darkness announcing, "Hey that was really great. Where shall we eat?"
Probably my biggest gripe with this and the previous entry is they break the promise of their titles. It's supposed to be Jurassic World, not Park. (Spoiler, this one goes a little way towards rectifying that but only in its last few minutes.) These films have a license to break free and run wild, yet they choose to remain tame and submissive.
